One of the games played at this month's gathering of the DWG was this 1940's clash in the Battle of France when French tanks counter-attacked the Sedan bridgehead at Stonne, 14km south of Sedan overlooking the Meuse river valley.
As German armoured spearheads carried out their charge to the channel it became imperative for the German infantry to move into the Sedan bridgehead to secure the German lodgement and protect the supplies that would follow.
German infantry was still the foot-slogging, horse powered entity that had entered the first war and it would take time for them to catch up the rapidly moving motorised elements thus providing an opportunity for French forces to counter-attack before the German lodgement could go firm with the infantry defences in place.
The town of Stonne with it's strategic position overlooking the Sedan crossing soon became a focal point as 10th Panzer Division along with Gross Deutschland (GD) Panzer Grenadiers were quickly moved to secure the area in the face of significant French forces including their heaviest tanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer-Grenadier-Division_Großdeutschland
Over the course of several days of heavy fighting, the town would change hands several times as both sides struggled for dominance and with the German attack in the west very much in the balance on the outcome of this battle.
In the end, despite French heroics culminating in the single handed attack by French tank commander Captain Pierre Billotte in his Char B1 who penetrated the German defences destroying two Panzer IV's, eleven Panzer III's and a couple of guns whilst receiving 140 non-penetrating hits on his tank, the town was held by the Germans when Stuka dive bomber support was brought to the defenders aid.
Our game was representing one of these attacks as French infantry having been forced out of the town were back on the offensive as they were joined by yet more French infantry supported by tanks.
In the town was a company of Gross Deutschland (GD) infantry with company assets including an HMG, light mortar, infantry gun and anti-tank gun platoon.
At some stage they could expect reinforcements of a StuG company and a further two platoon company of GD infantry.
The table for our game showing the initial set-ups and moves together with German reinforcement points |
Fireball are modelled on the next level up with bases of infantry representing sections and companies as units, but as far as I could see they would be easy to use at the IABSM level of groups and platoons.
Activity is driven by drawing out playing cards from a standard deck with red and black suits determining which sides forces get to activate, thus four black suit cards, followed by a red suit card would allow the German player to activate four units(companies) one after another unless interrupted by use of a limited number of initiative grabbing chits. The initiative would then revert to the French and continue for every further red card drawn and so on until all units had activated.
Our game was time limited to eight turns to put pressure on both sides to be holding the majority of the built up area on the northern edge of town held by the GD infantry at the start of play.
The French attack began with the French infantry that had been pushed out of the town earlier by GD infantry, moving to a hedge line on the western approaches and whilst taking infantry gun fire and light mortar attacks pushing over the road into the first block of houses opposite the grey house held by GD 3rd Zug.
French infantry move in of the western edges of the town |
The GD got the worst of it as they came to grips in the houses and were repulsed a platoon leader and section/squad lighter as the survivors fell back towards their company HQ.
Meanwhile French heavy tanks deploy on the road to the south |
Knowing the difficulties my anti-tank gun assets would have dealing with the French monster tanks and the likely ill-effects my infantry in the buildings might suffer from their 75mm guns, the GD wisely held their fire.
French infantry come under well directed artillery and mortar fire from the GD company support platoons |
My French opposite commander was conducting a French infantry tank attack, with his armour moving at infantry speed to stay in close proximity to his foot troops but buying the Germans much needed time.
Yet more French armour arrives in the wake of the heavy tanks soon to be supported by French infantry |
In return GD replied with small arms and HMG fire aimed at the French infantry following the tanks as the 75mm IG and mortars bombarded the French infantry trying to move through the houses in the west of the town.
As German small arms and heavy machine gun fire rake the slow advance, casualties mount on both sides |
The French attack was carried out slowly and cautiously |
The counter-attack by the StuG's had relieved the German company commander of one headache allowing him to redirect the fire of his IG and mortars towards the French main-force attack.
As the French attack closes on the town a German Pak At gun opens fire by the grey house in a desperate attempt to stop the Chars |
A Char B attempted to deal with the threat by firing down the road with its 37mm gun only to see the shots bounce off the StuG's heavy front armour.
Relief as StuG's clear the west of French infantry and stymie the French attack into the town from the south |
These infantry reinforcements allowed the GD to move in to secure buildings on the eastern and central sectors of the town backing up the forward elements of the initial defenders.
Suddenly a French tank explodes as a German Pak finds its mark |
One of the two gun teams had little choice but to open up frontally as French infantry closed in on the grounds of the grey house held by 2nd Zug.
They managed to squeeze off two rounds which bounced off the oncoming Hotchkiss before succumbing to the fire of the approaching French infantry.
All the GD defending infantry could do was hunker down and keep firing |
The battle reached its crescendo as the French and Germans fought bitterly in hand to hand in the house occupied by 2nd Zug. Clearing the ground floor the French took the fight upstairs as the lower floor was then counter-attacked by 1st Zug GD infantry from the house behind.
With the Hotchkiss tanks now presenting their flanks the last of the German PaK's opened up from an orchard on the eastern town-approaches and gained an early success as the first target exploded sending its turret up in the air.
The French tankers ignored the surprise fire and their armour shrugged off further insult as they poured their fire on the buildings to their front in support of their own infantry.
Despite the early success the German AT gunners kept seeing their shots bounce |
The high-water mark for the French attack as the grey house remains contested at turn eight |
The rules play very well and both Tom and I were soon getting our heads around the different dice combinations used to calculate hits from the various weapons. I particularly like the use of D20 or D10's to randomly determine effective range from one fire to another thus preventing the predictable, "I'll stop my advance right here to be just outside of effective range" approach to gaming where weapon ranges are constant, but allow that unreality of combat to occur.
Our playing of the game for the first time was greatly enhanced by having Si B as our game-meister for the day and thank you to him and Tom for a very fun day.
Sources referred to for this post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sedan_(1940)
http://kriegsimulation.blogspot.co.uk/2009/12/thunder-run-from-hell-cpt-billotte.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Billotte
https://www.facebook.com/Fireball-Forward-Tactical-World-War-Two-Wargaming-255037167843652/
I've always been amazed by the laser range finding abilities of troops on some wargames tables. No stopping outside the enemies optimum range with these rules.
ReplyDeleteI've played "Fireball Forward" a couple of times and they seem to capture the "feel" of small infantry actions pretty well. The rules are much like "Advanced Squad Leader" and I always liked that board game, before the rules became like War & Peace !
Vince
What a great looking game, love these French tanks...Nice period isn't it?
ReplyDeleteVery pretty cammouflage on the French armor. But why were the French being so careful with the Char B1s? As you recount in your historical intro Billotte's attack in a solitary Char rivalled Whitman's attack in Normandy during 1944. Indeed, for all intents and purposes the Char B1 might was well have been the Tiger of 1940. Yes, it had it's foibles but I would still call it far more (rather than no less) formidable than a Hotchkiss H35 or even an H39.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments chaps. Tom and I really enjoyed the rules and the period, not being a great 1940's player myself.
ReplyDeleteThe reason the Char B's were playing things cautious was that firstly both Tom and I were playing our first game with this rule set and the effects on infantry being shelled and gunned in buildings proved rather effective. Billotte like Whitman stand out because of the bravado of their attacks, with the majority of tankers being wary about committing themselves in among buildings with unspotted enemy assets about. Both AT guns held their fire unspotted to quite close range. In addition French tanks were rated with a brittle morale to represent their poor tactical handling, with the loss of a vehicle threatening the chance of the company retiring and also affecting French force morale. As mentioned in the post a more forceful armoured probe might have been more successful, but that will have to wait for the next game.
JJ
very nice report. I enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteHi Diego, thank you
DeleteJJ