Got the chance to put on the above at the club on
Saturday, having purchased my good friend JJ’s AWI collection last year.
I’d always admired the collection, so when the
opportunity came up to grab a bargain, I couldn’t resist!
Map illustration from the Black Powder AWI Supplement - I think that should read "Smallwood" at right |
Jon’s figure collection is quite old (Original Polly Oliver in the main, JJ ), and he says his painting style has changed a lot, but I like them.
http://www.pollyoliver.co.uk/
As a club, we’ve played with most variants of the Black
Powder (BP) rules; ‘Hail Caesar’ quite recently last year, ‘Pike and Shot’
earlier last year and BP with a few house rules for Balaclava in the Crimean, our summer game
‘big bash’ in North Devon a few years ago
I’d put on a game using the ‘Albion Triumphant supplement for
the Waterloo period a few years ago, and that’s been the only time the club
felt they hadn’t really worked.
I’d picked up the ‘Rebellion’ AWI supplement previously,
so was keen to try them out. I think it’s a really good supplement, loads of
information on the period; historical background, details of the forces
involved, a short piece on weapons and tactics and an overview of the main commanders
‘of note’. Over half the book though is made up of scenarios, nineteen in all,
featuring all the major land engagements of the war, plus others.
Looking though the scenarios, and comparing them with the
forces I had purchased, I settled on Germantown, 4th Oct 1777. This
sees Washington develop an elaborate plan to march five columns of troops, over
different roads, to arrive at the encamped Allied force simultaneously.
Needless to say, historically it didn't work (hindered even further by thick
fog) and not surprisingly, that was repeated in our game!
I used all the detail from the ‘Rebellion’ supplement to
generate the scenario. I like the different stat lines attributed to each unit,
which can reflect their ability to melee, shoot, recover morale (saving throw)
and become shaken (stamina), plus the ‘added extras’ to reflect increased
morale, better shooting or hand to hand qualities. All these can be ‘tinkered
with’ if you don’t like the author’s interpretation!
Each commander is also allocated a ’staff rating’, which
is basically their ability to get things done, rolling equal to or less then
their rating on 2D6. Again, if you don’t like them, change them! In this
scenario, all commanders were rated as ‘7’, which is pretty average, but
presented a few challenges for the rebel/patriot forces (depending where you’re
from!)
These are ‘as is’ from the book and also show the ‘order
of battle’ for each force.
So how did it play? On the day, due to the other games
going on, it was down to another long standing war game mate Vince and I to
give it a go.
Things didn’t start well, when Sullivan failed his first
command roll! In the scenario, all his force must be ‘on table’, before Greene
& Armstrong can start to arrive, and only when they’re all on can Stirling
and Smallwood attempt to enter.
Once Sullivan is on, and engaged with the British front
line, then the forces of Knyphausen and Grant can start to react. Cornwallis is
available once British units become destroyed or ‘shaken’. This never happened!
Sullivan and Greene managed to get all their troops on in
fairly good time, but Armstrong was clearly affected by the fog! This was to be
a factor throughout the game!
In the meantime, the 40th Foot had
occupied Chew house as they did historically, and there they stayed! Again historically.
Knyphausen moved the remainder of his force up in support of the 40th, pushing
the jagers out to his left flank to delay the militia with the long range of
their rifled muskets. Grant moved to deploy between the woods in support of the
1st Light infantry. The 2nd were left to fend for
themselves!
Eventually, all the rebel force entered the table,
although Armstrong was still affected by the fog and there was a similar story
on the other flank with Smallwood! Sullivan attempted to force the issue by
charging Chew house before the supporting forces arrived, knowing he was being
a bit rash, as the defenders were bot suitably depleted. This proved to be the
case, as although the first round was a draw, he was thrown back in the second.
This was the ‘high water mark’ of the rebel
forces, as it became pretty much a shooting match with Sullivan facing Knyphausen
and Greene facing Grant, a match the
rebels were unlikely to win! Not helped by the fact that yours truly had
deployed in ‘double lines’ not allowing the superior numbers of rebels to come
into action (too much Carnage & Glory JJ!!)
So with rebel units starting to disappear at an alarming
rate, and the British force only carrying one or two casualties per unit, we
agreed that it was time for the Rebels to withdraw, pretty much as they had
historically!!
I enjoyed getting my ‘new’ figures out on the table and
thought that the scenario gave a good game. Vince and I are old adversaries,
but the game was played in good spirit, with reference to the rules when
required, which usually gave the answer.
I must note that I
didn’t cater for the fog in the scenario; there is the ability to introduce
variable ranges based on a dice roll and potentially have the rebels shooting
at each other (which happened historically.) I’ve also seen a scenario where
the British are required to roll on their command rating to raise then from
their slumber, which may make for a more interesting slant.
I would definitely play this one again; it’s very much
suited to multiple players
Nice report. we very much like BP for this period.
ReplyDeleteThank you, I think the chaps enjoyed the way they play
DeleteJJ
Having played Blackpowder many times, I was keen to see how they held up in an AWI battle.
ReplyDeleteIt is not often you get a 1 v 1 battle at our club (just as it should be I think), so it was nice to face Steve again. We have played many times over the years and honours are about even. I tend to play an attacking, bullying style and Steve is more steady and insists on playing by the rules (cheating, I call it !". As Brits I would however be more on the defensive, with Steve forced to attack, so we would both be "boxing southpaw". That said I know Chew House is a key position, so some initial aggresion was called for.
Throwing the 40th Foot into the building dictated where my centre was going to anchor and I pushed Knyphausen's men up in support of the house, with the jagers forming my left. This gave Grant the right and I decided to move quickly to gain a position that restricted the frontage the rebels could use on that flank.
The game went much as I hoped and Steve's militia seemed unwilling (bad dice), to contest my left, leaving my jager's rifles free play. In the centre I beat off one charge on Chew House (reckless I thought) and we settled to exchanging volleys.
I was surprised to see the Americans in two lines on my right, but since I could only form one line with a lone unit in the second, I was more than happy. The rebs moved up and my right traded fire with them.
Then came one turn where Steve disordered every unit he fired at (six in total). Anyone who plays Blackpowder knows that such a move is rare and deserves to be exploited. I tried to sort my force out, but still had 4 units standing in the front line disordered in Steve's next bound. I waited for the charge and nothing happened. Not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I sorted things out properly and settled down to do what Brits do best; load, present, fire, repeat.
A couple more turns settled matters and we agreed the Americans had to withdraw, as not a single Brit unit was shaken.
To be fair Steve had some bad dice, not least with his militia, but I think deploying on a wider frontage might have allowed his numbers to beat my quality. After all, a bullet doesn't know they are Grenadiers !
I thought the rules reflected the period well and a good time was had by all.
Vince
Load. Present, Fire, Repeat, it's like watching that Fort Niagra video again.
ReplyDelete