Saturday, 8 September 2012

Siege of Turin 7th September 1706 - Beneath the Lilly Banners

Our second game at this months club gathering saw a 28mm scenario using "Beneath the Lilly Banners". I have played these rules previously and know they work very well for the period covered.
Our scenario set during the War of Spanish Succession had the Imperial forces under Prince Eugene advancing to attack the French forces under Marshal Marsin laying siege to Turin.

The Bourbon forces were caught napping with their line of circumvallation still incomplete when the Imperial Army attacked. To reflect the surprise and effects of the siege on the French, their morale checks became subject to a negative modifier the closer the Imperialists came to their camp just behind the siege lines.

In addition they had to contend with a potential sally from the Turin garrison.

The following pictures give a flavour of the game showing the French coming out of their camp to meet Eugene's forces, with the subsequent fight in the middle of the table braking the French army and the siege.

September Games - Normandy to Turin

Hi all,

The autumn season was kicked off with a couple of games covering action in the boacage using "Kampfgruppe Normandy" and the Relief of Turin in the War of Spanish Succession using "Beneath the Lilly Banners".

The opportunity came up today to have a go at the KG Normandy rule set from the now defunct Warhammer Historical stable. As a confirmed WWII and "I aint been shot mum" fan, I was looking forward to see how these rules play. We had a typical Normandy scenario with the Yanks trying to push down a narrow bocage festooned road supported by lots of artillery and a few Shermans. They were faced off by a similar group of German infantry supported by a couple of PzIV (Tigers).

US Recce and Artillery OP survey the road ahead
 I have to say that first impressions are positive, with a straightforward IgoUgo play sequence based on command points to allow unit activations. The combat and morale is all d6 based and we found the game was easily learnt and sped along well. The core of the system lies around the morale management of your force. As a force suffers losses and suppressions, the commanders have to decide when to rally suppressed sections or vehicles to take up the fight at the risk of losing army morale points which will eat away at your forces will to continue the fight. In the end both sides were forced to not rally sections because they couldn't run the risk of a big loss of morale. This forced both sides to rely on the final combats being done by their remaining fresh units.

GI's in the bocage

"Move out"
"Achtung Amis!!"
Scratch one Ronson
The recce up the road comes under fire
Payback - scratch one Tiger?
Another panzer brews up
US armour closes in as the Germans prepare to bug out.
Our game swung away from the German force as soon as both their Panzers were lost and the resultant drop in morale. This with multiple unit suppressions left them teetering on retreat, and with the failure of the last remaining fresh section unable to take out a US Sherman with Panzerfausts, the resultant return fire ended all German resistance.

Two observations from our game was that we felt that Panzerfausts were not as representativly destructive as their historical counterparts proved to be. This could easily be remedied by altering their strike factor. The other is with the mechanic around using fire to suppress the enemy being rather to predictive. ie The US would brassup the German hedgerows but not advance until they could see that all or most sections were suitably suppressed. Quite sensible really, but not very realistic. One alternative would be to indicate potentially suppressed units but not confirm their status until they wished to activate thus keeping all sides uncertain about their state.

A very enjoyable afternoons wargaming, thanks to Nathan, Jason, Gus, Martin and Ian.